Friday, December 30, 2016

Scissorhands Strikes Again?: 'Ballerina' Gets US Trailer


Ahhh, the Weinsteins... Not quite a great track record of animation you got there. Their latest, however, seems to be an exception.

The French production Ballerina was released in October in its country of origin, and its English dub received a general UK release a few weeks back. The picture, so far, has been met with pretty positive reviews. Here, in the states, the Weinstein Company is releasing it under the rather dumb new title Leap!, but their trailer for it indicates that we will be getting the film the UK saw.


That's a shocker!

As many an animation fan may know, the Weinsteins have butchered and sliced up animated films from other parts of the world. The Magic Roundabout is perhaps the best example, a 2005 CG adaptation of a popular 60s European stop-motion series. When brought here a year later, the whole script was rewritten and an all-star American cast did the voices. It was a disaster. They did the same thing not too long ago to the Argentinian Metegol, and constantly delayed it till it was sent straight to video back in July. Two years after it was set to debut in the US! Three years after it came out in Argentina! And get this... The film already had an English dub made up of UK actors that got released overseas!

Then of course, brother Harvey himself had to nerve to try and cut a Hayao Miyazaki masterpiece! That ended quite well, I'd say...

It's good to see that Ballerina (sorry, still calling it that) won't be just that, though anything is possible. Perhaps they've finally gotten the memo? They didn't scissor up and re-imagine Paddington, which ended up being a good-sized success in America, and won excellent reviews. This guy quite liked it, too - reminded me of an old-school live-action family film that you don't see too often these days. The sequel is out in Europe in the fall, hope we don't have to wait too long for it.

The trailer is pretty bad, though. The editing, the way it's put together, makes the film look like a run of the mill kids' flick... Watch the superior UK trailer instead, it makes the film look good, has more on the story, and it makes it seem a little heartfelt.


TWC is releasing Ballerina/Leap! on March 3, 2017, so I expect it to just come and go. Not a huge success, but it could be something of a tiny sleeper. I think the date does it little favors, having it right after Rock Dog (not saying that's gonna be a Finding Dory-sized titan, but you get the idea) and a few weeks before the live-action Beauty and the Beast. I just hope it does well enough, and that Weinstein gets it together when it comes to future animated releases.

Them dumping the American Underdogs and not tampering with this seems to suggest that lessons have been learned.

What say you?

Monday, December 26, 2016

Already Gearing Up: 'The Star' Logo and Website Revealed


Sony Animation's The Star isn't out till the next holiday season, but on Christmas Day, they already got the ball rolling...

The Star looks and sounds like a sort of modern-day Nestor the Long-Eared Christmas Donkey / The Small One, an animated take on the familiar Nativity story with the protagonist being the donkey. Originally, this film was going to be about a lamb, and was actually called The Lamb. Timothy Reckart, director of the acclaimed short Head over Heels, will helm the picture.

We have a new logo for the movie...




The recently-launched website reveals that Sony Animation is partnering up with Walden Media (best known for Holes and the Narnia films) to do this film, and will also bill it as a picture from their Christian film label Affirm Films. Cast announcements are supposed to come soon, says Patheos. A new plot synopsis has been released as well...

"In Sony Pictures Animation's The Star, a small but brave donkey named Bo yearns for a life beyond his daily grind at the village mill. One day he finds the courage to break free, and finally goes on the adventure of his dreams. On his journey, he teams up with Ruth, a lovable sheep who has lost her flock and Dave, a dove with lofty aspirations. Along with three wisecracking camels and some eccentric stable animals, Bo and his new friends follow the Star and become accidental heroes in the greatest story ever told – the first Christmas."

Sounds kind of like a combination of the usual animated critter romp and something more interesting. This sits cheek-and-jowl with two other Sony Animation films next year, both of which couldn't be anymore different: Smurfs: The Lost Village and The Emoji Movie. This film certainly excites me more than those two, but will it be a surprisingly good retelling of this story? Or will it be a forgettable matinee? Who knows.

What say you?

Carrying a Tune: 'Sing' Opens Well


Now that the Christmas week and weekend are over, what are the results?

Illumination's Sing lead the animated pack, which isn't surprising given that it's the new film from the reliably hit-making Despicable Me creators. That being said, the opening wasn't as spectacular as I thought it would be. It's still very good, because Illumination is smart with budgets. For those who don't know, they send the work to a French studio they own called Mac Guff. This is why their animated films cost less than $80 million to make.

Sing also debuted at #2, because of a strong hold-over for Rogue One. It pulled in $35 million for the three-day, and $55 million for the five-day. With Monday estimates already in, the film is currently at $76 million. Worldwide? $93 million. Key markets like the UK and Japan haven't gotten the film yet, it doesn't open in the country it was made in until next month. Russia and Japan have to wait until March. I'm sure it'll do fine over in those territories. Look for a leggy run with this one...

With a bevy of new releases, Moana slipped from second place to sixth. Only dropping 41%, the weekend total was $7 million, bringing the picture up to $180 million domestically. Monday estimates take it to $183 million. Worldwide, it's at $327 million. Like Sing, it has yet to open in a few major markets as well. At this point in its run back in 2010, Tangled was at $146 million. This means $237 million might be the ceiling for Moana, which is pretty darn good. That would be a stellar 4.3x the three-day opening weekend gross, 2.8x the five-day. Tangled made 4.1x its three-day, and 2.9x its five-day. If Moana performs more like that, then we'll be looking at a possible $240 million+ gross.

Trolls lost over 1,000 theaters and dipped 71% for the three-day, with a $390k take, $575k for the four-day. Worldwide, it is at $329 million. The picture looks to finish somewhere below $155 million in North America, a solid number that puts it between Kung Fu Panda 3 ($141 million) and Home ($177 million). Here's hoping the last two Fox-DreamWorks pictures do well.

No numbers for Storks just yet...

To be updated...

Another Breed of Superhero: First Look at DreamWorks' 'Captain Underpants'


Have no fear, your first look at DreamWorks' other 2017 release is here.

Captain Underpants...

Who would've thought, right? I bet many aren't digging the idea of a movie based on the Dav Pilkey book series, others probably aren't shocked that DreamWorks opted to adapt them. Even though DreamWorks has shown for over eight years that they can tell good stories that don't fall back on cheap toilet humor and such, some people out there still believe that every new DreamWorks movie is a fartfest. Captain Underpants moving forward more than "confirms" that for them.

For those not in the know, Captain Underpants is exactly what it says on the box. Two fourth graders hypnotize their school principal, whose is described as tyrannical, into becoming a superhero. A big man with no powers who is only wearing a curtain cape and underpants. It's as ridiculous as it looks, folks. Being a 90s kid, I remember the books being a big staple at every book fair at my elementary school. It was a big deal back then, and other schools weren't as welcoming to the series as mine was. They went as far as banning them, due to their fear of them being inappropriate for young readers and also fearing that they would encourage them to... Yes, disobey authorities.

It has quite a history, and it actually kind of seems like prime material to turn into a silly animated comedy. The first look at the film, provided by Entertainment Weekly, shows something that I think actually has some potential...


No different from the style used in Blue Sky's The Peanuts Movie, what they've got here looks pretty good and is pretty much the illustrations of the books brought to the big screen. What wasn't stated in the report is this: DreamWorks actually outsourced this production to Mikros, who have houses in Canada and France. A smart idea in hindsight, because spending Trolls money ($125 million) on this kind of movie isn't a good idea.

That's not all, though. Director David Soren (who directed DreamWorks' Turbo) said that the film will not only be irreverent like the books, but it will also have a lot of fun with its own visuals: Stylized CG isn't the only thing you'll see in it, you'll also see traditionally animated (!) scenes that will look like comic book panels come to life, and also sock puppets of all things, and more. A real mixed-media kind of animated feature.

Soren also revealed that the story will feel like something made by the two fourth grade protagonists. Back when it was announced, my question has always been, will DreamWorks be able to keep the series' style funny and not cringeworthy for a whole 90-or-so minutes? Unlike some of the DreamWorks movies of the 2000s, Captain Underpants isn't a series that uses toilet humor to get a laugh. It's a series that is pretty much built around grossness, I mean c'mon... That's in the title alone! Just looks at the volume titles, too. The movie could be like the cinematic equivalent of a Ren & Stimpy episode. In another way, it could subvert superhero movies, since those have been dominating.

I know, it's the last thing feature animation in America needs, but it's here, so I say... Might as well hope for the best. With the first look now out, I wonder when the teaser will surface?

What say you?

Sunday, December 25, 2016

Strumming Pixar: First Image and More Details from 'Coco'


What a lovely Christmas present... A bit of Pixar's next original movie!

That's right, a lovely-looking image and some more plot details on Coco have been released. The film is set to open Thanksgiving week of this coming year.


The new look at the film from Entertainment Weekly sheds more light on the musical side of the picture. This will not be a Renaissance Disney-style musical, where characters break out into song. In director Lee Unkrich's words, the film is "set against the backdrop of musical performance." So, still a musical in some way, but not the kind of musical you may be thinking of. That's good!

When Pixar was making Toy Story back in the early-to-mid 1990s, the attitude was essentially, "Let's not make a modern Disney animated feature." Nothing with musical numbers sung by characters onscreen, nothing with "I Want" songs, the usual with Disney's early 90s juggernaut hits. Pixar didn't want to make the next The Lion King or Beauty and the Beast, and this is partially why Toy Story took off in 1995.

Years went by. Some Pixar films had songs that were sung offscreen (the Toy Story films, the Cars films), some incidental musical numbers (Brave's 'Song of Mor'du') showed up, but other than that Pixar has mostly avoided musical movies like the plague. So to see them doing a movie where singing is integrated in a more realistic way is quite exciting, showing that animated musicals can be more than just what may be accustomed to. They can be more than the dramatic types where characters break out into song.

The article went on to stress how Pixar is being very careful with this film, and how they didn't want to resort to stereotypes when telling a story based in another culture. Upon apologizing for Disney's attempt to trademark the Day of the Dead holiday, Unkrich said, "This is a story we want to share with the world, but it’s also been particularly important to us that when the Latino community sees the film, that it resonates and it feels like we got it right, and that’s what we’re really trying to do. We all feel the gravity."

This comes hot off the heels of the recent controversy that surrounded The Hollywood Reporter's misfired animation roundtable on diversity. Coco certainly got some sneers when it came on the scene, many folk being concerned about the film stereotyping and appropriating Mexican culture. Some even suggested that Pixar, an American studio and director Lee Unkrich - an American without a Hispanic background - have no right to tell stories like these. (Funny, I didn't see them say that about the Portland-based LAIKA and director/founder Travis Knight, when they were readying their Kubo and the Two Strings.) Others spoke out in support of the project, despite the fact that it's mostly being spearheaded by Americans. One of those very supporters is Jorge Guiterrez himself, the writer-director of the other Day of the Dead, music-flavored animated film The Book of Life.

About the Day of the Dead... A new plot detail reveals a little something neat. As we learned last time, the music-loving Miguel comes from a music-averse family. They ban it because the kid's great-great-great grandmother was abandoned by her husband, who jumped ship on the family to pursue a career in music. Ever since, everyone in Miguel's family won't allow it. One night, Miguel does a little well-intentioned grave-robbing of his long-decased musical hero: Ernesto De La Cruz. On the Day of the Dead... And that sends him to the Land of the Dead! His music-averse relatives are sure going to like the sound of that!

This report and the previous one reaffirm that this will be the kind of Pixar film that seems to gel with everyone. This won't be a deceptively simplistic film like The Good Dinosaur, nor will it be a traditional kind of story that Brave was. Films like those proved to be divisive, Coco looks to channel the beloved Inside Out and WALL-E more than those films. As someone who quite liked those "lesser" films, and as one who is tired of animation having to have plots that are "dizzying" or "complex", I'm still excited about Coco. That's not because it's "true Pixar", but because of what it's setting out to do and then some. I'm also excited to see Pixar branch out into other parts of the world, too! How long before we see films of theirs that are set in Africa, Asia, and whatnot?

What say you?

Wednesday, December 21, 2016

The Co-Pilot Exits: Mireille Soria No Longer Co-President of DreamWorks


It looks like more changing and reshuffling is occurring at DreamWorks Animation, now that Comcast owns them and Universal oversees them...

Prior to being named President of DreamWorks Animation alongside producing veteran Bonnie Arnold, Soria has quite a history for herself. After years of live-action work, the ill-fated hand-drawn DreamWorks film Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron was Soria's first producing gig for the studio, and she went to produce Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas, all the Madagascar films, and Home.

In January of 2015, DreamWorks experienced major setbacks after a rough few years of box office disappointments. Over 500 animators were let go, the jam-packed movie slate was condensed, sister studio Pacific Data Images got shuttered, and some upper management folk like Bill Damaschke and Ann Daly were out. Soria and Arnold were named presidents of DreamWorks Animation during this time, and after the Comcast acquisition, they would be the ones to answer to the Universal executives.

DreamWorks is currently without a CEO, a leader akin to their former CEO/founder Jeffrey Katzenberg. Instead of finding another one, or a John Lasseter/Chris Meledendri-type, DreamWorks has opted to simply take the orders from the globe. I assume this is a "for now" kind of thing, but you never know.

Soria is now stepping down from the position, leaving Ms. Arnold alone. She'll remain a producer of future DreamWorks pictures, and curiously, future Madagascar installments. Per a statement by Universal Pictures' chairman Donna Langley, "she has shepherded a successful slate of films during her tenure at the studio, including the Madagascar franchise, of which she will continue to be involved as a producer."

So this confirms that the fourth Madagascar entry is still on. Now, prior to January 2015, Madagascar 4 was actually on DreamWorks' slate with an inked release date. She was, according to many sites, attached as director! When the slate was whittled down, it was one of the pictures that got axed... But from that slate, not for good. It's very possible that a fourth film will still happen sometime down the line, and it's also possible that she will direct it. If not, then I assume the originators Eric Darnell and Tom McGrath will helm it.

That being said, DreamWorks was given the go-head by Universal to terminate The Croods 2 this past autumn. A sequel to a hit original that made $187 million domestically and nearly $600 million worldwide. It's possible that DreamWorks may or may not move forward with the zoo gang if they're not up for another round, regardless of how well the past installments - barring spin-off Penguins of Madagascar - performed. We shall see...

Ms. Soria departs once Captain Underpants, due out on June 2nd, wraps up.

What say you?

Purebred: Details on Wes Anderson's Next Stop-Motion Film Revealed


Holy cuss! We finally have something of a first look at the next stop-motion animated film from Wes Anderson!

Who doesn't love Mr. Anderson's 2009 stop-mo adaptation of Fantastic Mr. Fox? No matter how far it may be from the Dahl classic, it's a one-of-a-kind animated film. Anderson brought his style to animation with finesse, the result was a film with a razor-sharp script, lowkey but prominent heart, a wonderful score, and splendid visuals. When it was announced that he was giving the medium another go for an original, mysterious picture about dogs, I was beyond excited!

We now know the name of the new canine film... Isle of Dogs...

Here's a first look at the Rex character, extracted from the man's Vimeo announcement...


It looks like Anderson and crew won't veer too far away from the overall aesthetic they used for Fantastic Mr. Fox.


It's a tiny first look, but exciting nonetheless! The expanded cast has also been revealed, and it's a knockout... Bill Murray (obviously), Bryan Cranston, Tilda Swinton, Frances McDormand, Scarlett Johansson, Greta Gerwig, Jeff Goldblum, F. Murray Abraham, Harvey Keitel, Akira Ito, Akira Takayama, Koyu Rankin, Courtney B. Vance, Yoko Ono, and Edward Norton...

Wow...

Are you cussing ready? I sure as cuss am!

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

Doomsday?: 'The Emoji Movie' Trailer Surfaces


Finally here, and I'm late to the party due to out-of-blogging responsibilities... The teaser for The Emoji Movie is finally here...

So is this the apocalypse? Did my eyes fall out of their sockets? Did my ears explode?


I didn't hate it.

Yes... But I didn't necessarily like it.

I'm more amused by the fact that the marketing seems self-aware, as if it's either saying "Yeah, we're sorry" or "We know you're not looking forward to this." We have this Eeyore Emoji who is quite thrilled to announce the movie to us, that I found kind of funny in a way. This could've been way worse.

Anyways. Check list.

Use of a classic or well-known song? Check.

A near "adult" joke? Check.

Toilet humor? Check. Gotta have that poop emoji in the movie!

It looks like your typical run-of-the-mill come-and-go animated comedy. Flavor of the week. I've pretty much been against the idea of this movie from the get-go, although I don't doubt that it could be decent. I'm actually willing to eat crow on this, but... This teaser really didn't leave me with much. Why is this movie here? Sony Pictures Animation could've gone forward with Genndy Tartakovsky's Popeye and Can You Imagine?, they could've gone forward with Lauren Faust's Medusa, or the stop-mo hybrid Superbago...

On the bright side, there's still The Star, Animated Spider-Man, and Vivo. Those sound like they have potential.

Another plus... It's not called Emojimovie: Express Yourself anymore.

I've got nothing. I'll be like the emoji in the trailer and give it a "meh".

What say you?

Monday, December 19, 2016

Short Rocker: New, Brief 'Rock Dog' Trailer Surfaces


With a little more than two months to go, Lionsgate has released a new trailer for Rock Dog...

A refresher: Rock Dog is an American-Chinese co-production that hit theaters in the Middle Kingdom this past summer. Reel FX, the good folks who gave us The Book of Life, was contracted to do the animation for the film. Lionsgate will be releasing it here in February.


Like I've been saying, I'm digging this. The short trailer is pretty decent, ping-pongs a bit here and there, but the movie I think looks and sounds promising.

It looks like a fun The Gods Must Be Crazy-type adventure story set in an all-animals world (that setting really did dominate 2016's animated feature field, didn't it?), and both trailers haven't left me disappointed. I've heard some word on the street, saying that it indeed is something to look out for. Makes me wish Lionsgate didn't get it, because they normally don't put much effort into marketing their animated releases - good or bad.

Anyways, yes, I'm still on board. What say you?

Staying Afloat: 'Moana' Holds on Well in the Face of 'Rogue One'


Moana has some serious staying power!

Not even the new Star Wars event could stop it dead in its tracks, or make it drop more than 45%.

Moana dipped an excellent 31%, making $12 million for the weekend and collecting $162 million domestically overall. Still not out everywhere around the world, the worldwide total is $282 million.

Four weeks into its run, Tangled was at $127 million, while Frozen was at $192 million. If it keeps following former's path, the finish will be $235 million domestically... But who knows, will it surge in the coming weeks? Or stay the course? Christmas week gave these two big bumps, I assume the same will happen to this film. I think it still has a shot at $250 million domestic.

Trolls wasn't as lucky, but all is fine for now considering that the film topped $140 million last weekend. Falling 54%, the glittery colorful flick is now at $147 million domestically and $323 million worldwide. So far it has made 2 1/2x its budget, and I'm not sure if DreamWorks wants more than that.

Remember, Penguins of Madagascar made 2.8x its budget and the studio considered that a loss... But they didn't consider Home, which made 2.9x its budget, a flop. Perhaps that's because Home fared far better here than Penguins. The Madagascar spin-off missed $100 million in the states, whereas Home made $177 million. I think that a lot to do with it. With an amount not much less than that, Trolls could be fine. Again, we'll have to wait and see.

Storks still flies a bit, but hasn't inched past $71 million domestically yet. Worldwide it saw an itsy boost, it is up to $179 million.

A re-issue of The Polar Express got onto the charts with a tiny $67k.

The Secret Life of Pets is pretty much done, yet still rolling in some houses. Same numbers as last weekend: $368m domestic / $875m worldwide.

Friday, December 16, 2016

2017's Other Bovine: Long-Delayed 'Bunyan & Babe' Releasing Next Month


What in the world is Bunyan & Babe?

Where did this take on the Paul Bunyan legend come from? Well, some of us have actually known about it for a while. Tony Bancroft, Disney veteran and the other Bancroft brother, was set to direct this film and MGM was set to release it.

That was years and years ago. We barely heard anything about it since... Now, out of the blue (ha ha, get it?), it's a thing...


At first, I kind of ignored the choppy, low budget animation and the whole direct-to-video feel of it. I was thinking, "Ok, let's see what they do with Paul Bunyan". But then the greedy land developer came in, I lost all interest. It's interesting to note that Mr. Bancroft also has a storyboard artist credit on Norm of the North, another cheapo animated movie that involved a greedy land developer. My guess is that Bancroft worked on an early, early version of that movie. A version that was probably far different from the one we ended up getting.

Bunyan & Babe is not necessarily awful-looking, it's not Norm of the North thankfully. It looks like a run-of-the-mill straight-to-video kids' flick. Plus, the Dove endorsement pretty much gives it away.

So how did this movie end up getting finished?

Exodus Film Group, one of the studios that bankrolled the 2008 MGM animated release Igor, were going to do this film next. Sparx did the animation for Igor, and were set to work on this as well. Then of course MGM filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in late 2010, but after bouncing back, the film seemed to disappear. Sparx supposedly detached themselves from it. Bancroft seemingly moved on to other projects... I doesn't look like either of them worked on this final product.

It could be a Foodfight! situation where it was sold off to another studio after percolating for so long. Interestingly enough, the picture debuts on Google Play only on January 12th. It will be free for a limited time, too... The trailer says "Before it hits theaters"... Will it hit theaters? I also doubt that, it looks very straight-to-video, but if it does... Color me shocked, because that would be quite an experiment: Release a movie on Google Play only, then release it to theaters afterwards. Not too farfetched in a world with same-day-as-theaters VOD streaming and such. The best it can get at this rate is a very limited release like another Exodus animated movie: The Hero of Color City.

Not quite an event, but it's interesting to see where some long-brewing animated features go...

Also, a bit odd, we'll have two animated movies about bovines next year. This, and Blue Sky's Ferdinand.

Thursday, December 15, 2016

Time to Cry: Full Trailer for 'The Boss Baby' Surfaces


Out in three months, DreamWorks' The Boss Baby got itself a full trailer...

Right off the bat, I wouldn't call this a good trailer. If you're new here, I have a particular frustration with American animated movie trailers. They aggressively dart from jokes to story bits to jokes to story bits, and when they end, I'm like... "Okay, what did I just watch?" But I don't review trailers for their editing, what's the footage like?


Well, this looks a little weird in some ways, but in other ways it looks like a typical lightweight animated comedy-romp. There's the frenetic tone, the one-liners, the goofy premise, and some inevitable gross-out humor. The trailer clarifies that a lot of it is pretty much happening in the older brother's imagination, which is kind of cool, but I can only imagine how they'll stretch that out to 90 minutes.

It's also interesting how the boss himself talks, but the other babies act like babies. It very much reminded me of the old Family Guy episode where Stewie, during his first birthday party, is trying to assemble a team out of the neighbor babies. They of course act like babies, much to his frustration. Anyways, in terms of the story? I'm pretty iffy on this one. The Boss Baby is pretty much spillover, it's a product of a short era where the studio was quietly regrouping after the fallout in January 2015.

Context: DreamWorks had a lot of box office misses over the span of two years, and only two pictures released during this troubled time - The Croods and How To Train Your Dragon 2 - made a profit. The final straw was Penguins of Madagascar, which posted very low numbers domestically. So in January 2015, DreamWorks shut down sister studio/veteran house Pacific Data Images, laid off over 500 employees, and drastically reduced the number of films on their slate. Then former CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg took it upon himself to really oversee the next couple of features, The Boss Baby included. It was pretty much in the can before Comcast stepped in.

Boss Baby could go either way. It could be a sharp, clever comedy like director Tom McGrath's third Madagascar installment, or it could be all over the place like The Croods, or it could be a plain-nothing movie like Turbo. It looks very, very hyperactive but there were some bits that made me laugh.

I actually am kind of digging the very soft animation style they went for. In a few interviews, some of the crew emphasized how they wanted this film to have a retro cartoony feel, and I definitely get a slight 50s vibe out of the whole thing. Everything looks kind of painterly and like something you'd see out of an old animated commercial or something. It certainly looks unlike many of DreamWorks' CG pictures.

The verdict? I really don't know. The story seems kind of there, but some of the humor is good, seems very jumpy, I like the look of it, and hopefully it's a solid comedy in the end.

What say you?

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Singin' Sony: Sony Animation and Lin-Manuel Miranda Launch Monkey Musical 'Vivo'


A little shocker announcement that came out nowhere... Sony Animation's got something interesting cooking.

Vivo is the name of the film.

Lin-Manuel Miranda is doing the songs... All eleven of them. The Croods director Kirk DeMicco will helm the picture, and long-timer Lisa Stewart (Almost Famous, Monsters vs. Aliens) is set to produce. Originally pitched to DreamWorks six years ago by High School Musical creator Peter Barsoccini, the project will also be written by a LMM comrade, the writer of his In the Heights - Quiara Alegría Hudes.

A pretty strong line-up right there. Sony Animation's brass is very confident in this tale, the story of a music-loving capuchin monkey that goes on an epic journey from Havana to Miami to meet his goals. It now has a concrete release date... December 18, 2020.

Sony Animation had originally staked out December 11 of 2020 for an "Untitled Original", the slot is filled, and the movie in question moved back a bit. Yes, they seem super-confident in Vivo. Why wouldn't they? Hot off the success of Moana, not to mention Hamilton and the slew of upcoming LMM projects (Mary Poppins Returns, for starters), it makes sense. What I didn't know was that it was in the works for a long while before Moana entered development, about a year before Ron Clements and John Musker even pitched what eventually became Moana!

Anyways, this is great. I was originally a bit bummed on Sony's line-up, what with Emoji movies and stuff. This, alongside the animated Spider-Man movie and The Star give me a bit of hope. Whatever those untitled 2019 "franchise" entries are, I could kind of care less right now. Vivo sounds cool, it's neat to see Lin-Manuel diving into more animation, since his new Walt Disney Animation Studios project is probably quite a long ways off. I like the idea of a musical set in Havana, alongside some other things. If Emojimovie pays for more cool stuff like this, then that's all good.

What say you?

The Baddies are Back: 'Despicable Me 3' Teaser Surfaces


The teaser for the soon-to-be billion-dollar smash Despicable Me 3 is finally here, and...

It looks pretty good.


Yes. I'm actually looking forward to this now... Shocker!

Why's that? It has two things that already make it look better than the pleasant but forgettable Despicable Me 2... Less Minions, and an already-cool villain. I barely remember the bad guy from Despicable Me 2, but this guy? Already digging his stuck-in-the-80s look, gadgets and attitude, and he just seems like a fun adversary for Gru.

The other thing that makes it look good? Less Minions. They only appear for a few seconds at the end, I hope the movie is no different. Too much Minions in the second one, they couldn't quite carry the spin-off, and if you're a facebooker... Well, you'd be sick of Minions yourself. So yeah, for now, I think Despicable Me 3 looks like a step in the right direction.

I laughed a few times, too, oddly enough. I've said it here before, but despite a lot of been there-done that stuff, I find the first Despicable Me to be a solid family comedy while 2 was the fluff. Hoping part tre goes back to what I liked about the first film.

What say you?

Monday, December 12, 2016

Atop the Wave: 'Moana' Stays at #1


In its last weekend with little competition, Moana was victorious.

Narrowly edging out newcomer comedy Office Christmas Party, Moana grossed a great $18 million, down a strong 34%. A little less than Tangled's drop during that frame, and much less than Frozen's, Moana could still make 4x the three-day and cross $220 million domestically. I have a feeling Moana will hold on well against Rogue One and Sing, but will it hit two-five-oh domestically?

We shall see.

Worldwide, now that it's out in a couple more territories, it's at $240 million.

Trolls lingers in the top ten, more than a month after its debut. With a small 35% drop, it took in $3 million for the weekend, and it's now at $145 million here. Worldwide, it has made $317 million. More than 2 1/2x the $125 million budget. Let's hope it goes even higher from here, because if it falls short of what DreamWorks/Uni want, I fear it could lead to even more layoffs. We don't need that, and it's why I don't want The Boss Baby and Captain Underpants to go belly-up.

Storks still plays in over 200 theaters, but it's pretty much running on a low amount of fuel. $72 million looks to be the final total here, and $177 million everywhere. The only market it's relatively new to is South Korea, but I doubt they propel it far past $180 million. Still, $177 million on a $70 million budget is A-OK. Perfectly shows that you have to be budget-conscious sometimes, because your animated movie can't just easily pull $200-250 million worldwide grosses out of a hat.

The Secret Life of Pets still barks a bit, but nothing much has changed: $368 million stateside, $875 million worldwide. Wonder if Sing comes anywhere close...

Finding Dory ended its run on the 8th. $486 million domestically, as said before the biggest for an animated film in North America, topping the record held for 12 years by Shrek 2. Worldwide is a different story. It barely eked past Zootopia, made a stellar $1,027 million, but didn't quite flood Frozen.

Now we shall see how Moana does on the battlefield next weekend...

Sphere O' Gold '16: Golden Globe Nominees Out


The appetizer to the Oscars, the Golden Globes... Every December, every late winter...

The best animated feature line-up is surprisingly a little diverse this time around, considering that in the past, the animated category had mostly left out foreign entries. Here, we have the Swiss-French film My Life as a Zucchini, a stop-motion film that GKIDS locked up. Supposedly weighty and not afraid to go down some dark avenues, I see this film easily getting into the race for the gold man now. In the past, I thought it had a good chance at getting in. Now, it could very well be up for an Oscar nomination despite some pretty rough indie competition.

The next three were expected. Kubo and the Two Strings is up, as well as Zootopia and Moana. What I didn't expect was Sing...


That good, huh? From everything I'm hearing, it's a well-rounded, well-made comedy musical that seems to be leagues ahead of Illumination's post-Despicable Me output. The film is not even out here in the states, and it's already making some waves. I'm actually pretty excited for it, the newest trailer really makes it look like it could be fun and toe-tapping. But among the best of the year? I'll have to see about that!

Finding Dory, unsurprisingly, is out of the race. Not the first time a Pixar film - sequel or not - didn't make it at the Globes.

I think this time, it has more to do with the amount of truly high quality features that came out this year. Finding Dory, being very good, perhaps had small chances at getting into the final five. I have a feeling the same will go for the Oscars, as they - in 2013 - didn't hesitate to squeeze out Monsters University, and nominate middling fare like The Croods and Despicable Me 2. I know it's not chic to think Monsters University is anything above mediocre, but I felt it was very good, and actually better than the three mainstreamers of 2013 that were nominated for Best Animated Feature Oscar. Yes, that includes Frozen.

Finding Dory's miss is a bit disappointing, but at the same time there's so much good stuff this year that I'm not distraught over it. While Finding Dory was a personal film for me, I can handle it being out of the race. If I feel it's better than Sing, then I'll have questions for the Globe nominators.

Anyways, this has little bearing on my overall predictions for the Oscars. Since they're nominating more and more foreign works, I have a feeling that Sing won't get in, instead we'll get two indies. For a while, I was thinking April and the Extraordinary World and The Red Turtle would be the ones to get in, but now I think Zucchini has a lot of potential. Phantom Boy and Your Name still aren't out of the question. The three mainstreamers are obvious at this point: Zootopia, Kubo and the Two Strings, and Moana...

I'll eat crow if one of them doesn't make it.


If you check out what the critics' circles are saying, you'll find a bunch of different results. So far...

Zootopia has three wins: Critics' Choice, NY Film Critics, and the AFI. The latter has the film on a Top 10 best of the year list... Yes, an animated movie on a best of the year in general list. That's awesome.

Kubo and the Two Strings has a whopping four: National Board of Review, Atlanta Critics, Washington D.C. Critics, and Boston Online Critics. Wow!

The LA Film Critics chose Your Name, while the European Film Awards went for My Life as a Zucchini.

This means nothing, though. Remember back in 2012, none of the critics circles named Brave the best animated film of the year. The film won the Oscar and the Golden Globe, despite not being one of the year's stronger contenders. Now, you can argue that times have changed and that the Academy probably has new rules that require them to actually watch the movies before picking, but who knows. The Oscars, despite the supposedly new rules, still gave Inside Out the gold man at the last ceremony. Not a dig on Inside Out, it's a fantastic film, but I still get the sense that they didn't watch the others, or decided to just give it to the safe option - a mainstream, not to mention Disney-released film. The same applies for Big Hero 6's win for Best Animated Feature 2014.

Anyways, right now, it seems like Zootopia and Kubo are the darlings. One's from Disney, the other is from LAIKA, who has yet to win an Oscar for Best Animated Feature. Or a Golden Globe for that matter. ParaNorman was completely snubbed by the Globes in 2012, they gave the nom to Hotel Transylvania instead.

So I have a feeling the Globes are going to be predictable. Either Zootopia or Moana takes it home.

As for the Oscars, Zootopia is probably still locked to win.

Now because Moana's a musical, we're hearing some things here and there. Only 'How Far I'll Go' is in the running, alongside Trolls' 'Can't Stop the Feeling'. A pleasant pop song at best, I would've removed it to make room for another Moana song. If you were to ask me what Moana song I would give the award to, it would be 'I Am Moana (Song of the Ancestors)'... That's just my personal pick, though.

As for best animated feature, if I had to choose between the two Walt Disney Animation Studios films, I'd easily pick Zootopia. Moana's great, but it's comfort food. Zootopia does bold new things and its script is a little more consistent. Disney Animation should be rewarded for that, should they take anything home - be it spheres or statues.

Now throw in Kubo and the Two Strings, I would be okay with either Zootopia or Kubo and the Two Strings winning. Both are high points for modern mainstream feature animation.

Let the games begin!

Thursday, December 8, 2016

A New Candidate: Amazon Enters Feature Animation, Options 'Emily the Strange'


A new competitor is entering the world of feature animation. A big one that is part of a massive company... Amazon Studios.

Amazon Studios has been around for about 6 years, and up until now they've been doing TV shows. Their latest film, Jim Jarmusch's Paterson, is set to debut a few weeks from now. A good-sized theatrical release. They've got other films in the pipeline, and now their first animated film is in development, a film based on Emily the Strange.


Created back in the early 90s by skateboarder Rob Reger, the rebellious goth girl first appeared on clothing and other merchandise, and then later got her own graphic novel series in the early 2000s. A feature adaptation has been in the cards for a while. Universal and Illumination were set to make a live-action film based on the series a while back, but the rights eventually reverted back to Dark Horse Comics.

The new animated film take, according to The Hollywood Reporter, looks to "keep the authenticity and edge of the property". While it is still in the early stages of development, it's interesting to see Amazon Studios finally getting into the animated features business. We saw Netflix swoop in earlier this year when they acquired The Little Prince for stateside distribution after Paramount quietly dumped it.

If anything, it shows how streaming could make a real dent in the animated features world. More than anything, I find it interesting that Amazon optioned Emily the Strange of all things. It's definitely an out-there character and series, and the aesthetic of the comics and related animated shorts is pretty good material for animation. I just wonder if it'll be a traditionally animated film or a CG one, because I think 2D would suit it, plus because it's Amazon, perhaps they could get away with doing a 2D film and not have to worry about having to pull a big gross out of hat.

What say you?

Tuesday, December 6, 2016

No Longer Bare Bones: 'Coco' Details Surface


After months and months of vague hints and minor announcements, we finally have learned a lot more about Pixar's next original movie...

Directed by long-time Pixarian and Toy Story 3 director Lee Unkrich, Coco will be the Emeryville studio's take on the Day of the Dead holiday. It's been talked about for years, and it got its concrete release over a year ago. A more detailed plot synopsis is one of the many great tidbits we got today.

"Coco follows the secret musical ambitions of Miguel, who resides in a lively, loud Mexican village but comes from a family of shoemakers that may be the town’s only music-hating household. For generations, the Riveras have banned music because they believe they’ve been cursed by it; as their family history goes, Miguel’s great-great-grandfather abandoned his wife decades earlier to follow his own dreams of performing, leaving Imelda (Miguel’s great-great-grandmother) to take control as the matriarch of the now-thriving Rivera line and declare music dead to the family forever."

It's interesting how music is going to be worked into this story, but it's been clarified that Coco won't really be a musical. Randy Newman, in an interview, described Unkrich's film as a "musical"... But I guess it's not the case anymore. I've heard hints before this that suggested it wouldn't be a typical musical, either. There will be singing from the cast, we'll hear traditional and original songs, but Pixar - according to Vanity Fair - isn't keen on calling it a musical.

In addition to the plot synopsis, we got a new piece of concept art that gives you a good idea how the final product will look. It is indeed gorgeous...


Voicing main character Miguel is a newcomer named Anthony Gonzalez, he'll be joined by Benjamin Bratt (who previously let it slip that he was part of the cast), Gael Garcia Bernal, and Renee Victor.

There's even more to the released synopsis...

"But Miguel harbors a secret desire to seize his musical moment, inspired by his favorite singer of all time, the late Ernesto de la Cruz (Bratt). It’s only after Miguel discovers an amazing link between himself and De la Cruz that he takes action to emulate the famous singer and, in doing so, accidentally enters the Land of the Dead.

In the beautiful underworld, it’s not long until Miguel encounters the souls of his own family — generations’ worth of long-dead but no less vivacious Rivera ancestors, including great-great-grandmother Imelda. Still, given the opportunity to roam around the Land of the Dead, Miguel decides to track down De la Cruz himself. He teams up with another friendly (and skeletal) spirit — a trickster named Hector, voiced by Bernal — to find De la Cruz, earn his family’s blessing to perform, and return to the Land of the Living before time runs out."

Vanity Fair describes Pixar's version of the Land of the Dead as "a dazzlingly vibrant, stacked metropolis inspired by the Mexican city of Guanajuato". I hope that the film experiments with different styles of CGI, not dissimilar to how The Book of Life threw the CG rule book out the window with glee.

Now right off the bat, this is a very exciting storyline and it has enough to differentiate it from Jorge Guiterrez's visually exciting animated Day of the Dead tale, and it looks to have all that heart and humor. While it all sounds a bit dizzying, let's hope they balance it all out and hopefully explore some dark paths, too. This is Day and the Dead, and the title? It suggests that the actual Coco will be involved, the Coco (one of a few spellings, to my understanding) is a Hispanic folklore monster/bogeyman.

I also think it's the right step for Pixar to take. It looks as if they want to keep challenging themselves when it comes to original stories, especially after the reception the more traditional Brave got. The Good Dinosaur, to me, was more off the beaten path than some might believe. Of course, the inventive Inside Out was praised out the wazoo. Coco looks to be just as ambitious, but I love that they'll be focusing on another culture, because if there's one thing Pixar needs to do more, it's be diverse. So many American and a few European-set stories (Brave, Ratatouille), it's time to explore.

One slight downside for now? Michael Giacchino is doing the score. But wait a minute... Shouldn't I be excited that Giacchino is scoring it? I love Giacchino's work! But... I'd rather they get a Latin composer to do the job. With all due respect to Mr. Giacchino, he is one of the guys who normally scores Pixar's films. If it isn't him, then it's either Randy Newman or Thomas Newman. Few Pixar films used other composers; Patrick Doyle did Brave, and Mychael and Jeff Dana did The Good Dinosaur.

Anyways... I was always looking forward to this for obvious reasons. It's Pixar, it's an original story, it sounds exciting... Now I'm really geared up for it.

What say you?

Monday, December 5, 2016

ChangeWorks: New Universal/DreamWorks Slate Unveiled


Well, it has finally happened...

DreamWorks' slate has been reconfigured. It was only a matter weeks, after we heard about layoffs and Universal's desire to restructure the studio. The shuttering of The Croods 2 came first, then the reports about DreamWorks cutting ties with the Indian unit (DDI), and then the talk of the slate being changed up...

Exhibitor Relations broke the news...



How To Train Your Dragon 3 has been delayed yet again...

At this point, I say "Whatever it takes, that's all that matters." Better that than cancellation, because one could argue that it could've been on the chopping block following the acquisition. The same goes for Larrikins, which curiously hasn't gotten a new date...

Yet? Is it keeping the current February 16, 2018 slot? Or is that going somewhere else?

Now we know what Oriental DreamWorks' mystery feature is, the "young girl and a yeti" story that Jill Culton (formerly of Pixar, director of Sony Animation's Open Season) pitched a while back. It will be that very Oriental DreamWorks project that was teased back at the beginning of 2015, that very mystery project. It now has a concrete release date: September 27, 2019. Culton, shockingly, isn't directing. Tim Johnson - director of DreamWorks' own Antz, Over the Hedge, and Home - will direct instead.

Some takeaways...

What's going on with Larrikins? Does that stay in 2018? Why the hush-hush? I thought that film was being "pulled back into story".

Everest was a project that I suspected would be the ODW mystery film, given the setting and the fact that it was announced rather close to all the ODW news. I assume ODW will make significantly smaller films, films that won't require $100 million+ budgets, so I can only imagine how this will look and feel.

Nothing on Shadows and Shrek 5, films that were eying 2019.

It looks like Universal will keep it down. One new Glendale-made movie will be released every calendar year. Oriental DreamWorks will probably make one every other year, so DreamWorks can still have their cake and eat it too, similar to how they outsourced Captain Underpants to Mikros. I wonder if they'll outsource to them again if that movie does well next summer.

So now from the looks of it...

Larrikins - February 16, 2018?
How To Train Your Dragon 3 - March 1, 2019
Everest - September 27, 2019
Shrek 5 - 2020?
Shadows - ??

Perhaps we'll get some more concrete info soon...

Add-on: Focus Features, being part of Comcast, moved the untitled LAIKA film previously set for 4/4/2018 to Dragon 3's old date. Good move on their part, the older date would've pitted it against Disney's A Wrinkle in Time...

Saturday, December 3, 2016

Battling a Seastorm: 'Moana' To Hold On Well


This is the weekend where most of the big movies take a real tumble.

Moana, like the other recent November/holiday season Disney Animation films before it, was always going to drop over 50% this weekend. Let's look at the historical examples...

Tangled scored $68 million for its five-day Thanksgiving debut back in 2010, $48 million for the three-day. The second weekend gross was a 55% drop from the three-day. For Frozen, it was 53%. Both very solid, when things could've been worse. Live-action blockbusters usually get hit harder this weekend, with 60%+ drops.

Wreck-It Ralph and Big Hero 6, by contrast, opened at the beginning of November in their respective years. They tumbled 58% and 57% on their first post-Thanksgiving five-days, respectively.

Moana's numbers yesterday suggest that it will also dip lightly, and brave the oncoming wave. I always wondered why the first post-Thanksgiving weekend 3-day is the big drop off... Perhaps audiences shifting to holiday shopping and getting ready for the festivities? Or is it because of Thanksgiving break ending, and that taking away from the weekend?

Apparently it's on track for a $30 million+ weekend, a magnificent 47% drop... Frozen made $31 million on its second weekend... The legs are going to be quite strong for this one. Makes me wonder if it'll go a little above the amount I originally thought it would make in the end. At the end of the weekend, Moana should be well past $120 million. At that point in time, Frozen was up to $134 million.

Trolls looks to ease as well, projections say a roughly 54% dip is in play, putting the film above Kung Fu Panda 3's domestic gross from earlier this year. Both are doing fine in the top ten while blockbusters and smaller pics come and go.

Update...

Dropping an estimated 49.9% (!!!), Moana has collected $28 million for the weekend. It is now up to $119 million here, and it opened in a few key territories this weekend, so the worldwide gross is up to $177 million. Like most November-release Disney animated films, it'll be a slow crawl because many markets don't get this picture until the end of the first quarter of next year.

Trolls dropped 56%, made $4 million, it's up to $141 million here and $296 million everywhere. Really seems to be stalling overseas for some reason.

The Secret Life of Pets still lingers, with $368 million domestically and $874 million worldwide. Walt Disney Animation Studios won't be the only big studio having a banner year, because Sing is poised to do very, very well.

No word on the storks just yet...

To be updated...

Friday, December 2, 2016

Oceanic Epic: 'Moana' is a Thrilling, Fun, Familiar Adventure


The big epic Broadway-style musical has returned with Walt Disney Animation Studios' 56th animated feature, Moana...

Warning, spoilers ahead...

How is it? If this past spring's Zootopia was the studio's grand new dish, Moana was the menu favorite... But this menu favorite was served up in a way that made its familiar elements feel fresh and fun again. No doubt about it, Moana is through-and-through a 90s Disney Renaissance film, and it is definitely a Ron Clements/John Musker film. Does it really do anything new? Not really. It's certainly more Little Mermaid than it is Treasure Planet. But is it executed very well? I think so.


Moana works off of Oceanic folklore to create a very cool, sometimes wild, and sometimes surreal fantasy adventure that only animation can do. Our main heroine loves the ocean, adventure, and doesn't quite want to fit into the mold that her society wants her to fit into. Long ago, demigod Maui stole the heart of the island goddess Te Fiti, a small green glowing stone. This unleashed hell on the islands, and little by little Moana's home island of Motunui is decaying. Crops are dying, the land is falling apart, soon it'll be curtains for her people...

Upon her grandmother's death, Moana sets sail to find Maui, intending to take him and the heart stone to where it belongs. Maui is hesitant, because of the dangers out there that want the stone, and because he doesn't have his legendary magical fish hook to fend for himself. What ensues is a buddy comedy on water, Moana and Maui really don't get along at first, not dissimilar to Tiana and Naveen's relationship in The Princess and the Frog. Little by little, as they work together, they begin to bond. While Moana is determined to undo the mistakes Maui has brought upon the islands, Maui is incredibly stubborn and quite arrogant. I really liked how these two worked off of each other, and it makes for some pretty good comedy too.


Also supplying some comedy is a stowaway rooster, Heihei. Dumber than the average chicken, Heihei is never overused in the way some Renaissance era sidekicks were. There was very little lowbrow humor, too, the tone was surprisingly pretty even for a 90s-style picture. Certainly more even than Frozen, in my humble opinion. The pacing was also pretty shocking too, the first act refreshingly takes it time while the middle feels a little bit wonky in places. Am I just too nuts about pacing? Rarely do I ever say something's so well-paced these days.

Visually, the film is indeed very nice. While I'm getting tired of photoreal computer animation, the lighting and color work in this film is still resplendent. Its most exciting parts, visually, used traditional animation along with other unexpected visual choices: Maui's tattoos, folk art-like cut-outs during the 'You're Welcome' song sequence, and the psychedelic visuals of Tamatoa's brilliantly over-the-top 'Shiny' number. I will be brutally honest though... I really wish this film was done in traditional animation.


This is not a dig on CGI or the sheer work that the Disney Animation team put into this movie's look, but it's a just a personal choice. I'm really beginning to sour on computer animation that's trying to be photoreal while trying to keep that unreal quality that makes animation so unique, but this is another rant for another day. The colors, character animation, lighting, and imagery still wows. The water too, just... Amazing...

What I particularly liked was how adventurous it was. Coconut-wearing pirate creatures pulling a Mad Max: Fury Ocean on our heroes, a whole seabed-like land full of weird monsters, a big battle with a lava monster, the ocean being a character, it was pretty imaginative and epic. I wasn't watching an animated Broadway musical set in a few key locations, it was like a Broadway musical and a sprawling trek, in the way something like Aladdin was. The cast is refreshingly small for this kind of narrative, but the faces we see are nonetheless entertaining and likable.


Bolstering all of this is the music from Lin-Manuel Miranda, Opetaia Foa'i, and Mark Mancina. The tunes follow the 90s beats, but are very enjoyable and leave you humming. 'Shiny' is a grade-A villain song, just our campy crustacean baddie basking in his collection. Moana's 'I Want' song is good stuff, as is the epic 'We Know The Way', some of the more emotional ones in the latter part of the middle third are sharp. Moana's grandmother returns in spiritual form to sing her the song of the ancestors, the scenes concerning Moana's grandmother in particular really hit home for me, having lost my grandmother a few years back, the sequence in question almost mirrored how it happened. Her reunion with her granddaughter is one of the film's most poignant moments.

Moana is in every way a work of Disney animated comfort food. It has the big songs, it has the spunky heroine who wants more, the music, the occasional over-the-top fun, a memorable baddie, some sadness, and a good touch of comedy. For me, this balanced all of the elements better than many of the Renaissance films did. At the same time, it bucked a few trends from that era. Our big epic battle with the lava witch isn't quite what one might think, there's really no towering bad guy to stop.


Tamatoa is a temporary monster that they have to trick, while the lava witch Te Ka is an enraged Te Fiti who needs her heart back. Really, most of the conflict is Maui's doing, and he's cocky to boot. Thankfully there are no twist villains either, because that could've been a mistake and would've felt quite redundant. The comic relief sidekick isn't overbearing or noisy, nor does this fowl in question interrupt deeper moments. In fact, Moana puts him in a pot and locks it in the boat's compartment, he stays put for a little while!

While not a particularly mind-blowing work, Moana is more than a pleasant diversion. It certainly does have things on its mind, and the telling of them is quite subtle. One of them I liked is Maui's initial search for more power, resulting in the stealing of the heart-stone. Self-discovery and confidence are also the name of the game too, and even a little dash of empathy. The film is not a joke-a-thon matinee or Redbox rental, and to be fair, none of the Disney animated films made under John Lasseter's watch have been just that. Moana basically continues the winning streak without anything really new to bring to the table. It certainly isn't the ambitious and wild Zootopia, nor is it the exciting and sprawling Wreck-It Ralph, but everything in it coagulates so well. Again, comfort food, but prepared with passion.

Soooo, what about our short film?


Inner Workings is a zippier Reason and Emotion with some dashes of Team Emeryville's recent mind movie, and in terms of the animation and directing, it's a lot of fun. As I've said before, I absolutely love the off-kilter style they went for, and the presentation itself compliments this style. If Disney Animation is going to stick with CGI, they might as well move away from whatever style they're using and go for looks like this, but that's also another ramble for another day. The 80s vibe was very cool, and there was some good humor in it, too. Some jokes were stretched a little thin, and perhaps the brain was a little too much of a worrywart, but it was overall very enjoyable and a real visual treat.

Quite the double-bill, and the perfect capper to Walt Disney Animation Studios' great year. Two new films, both great, both successful, I say we animation fans got the goods.

Rough Transitioning: DreamWorks To Lay Off 170 Staff Members, More Delays?


It looks like the moon boy studio is being hit again...

More layoffs.

This was inevitable after strong rumors surfaced, ones that said DreamWorks would significantly downsize following the Comcast acquisition. It is official now, the Glendale studio will lay off roughly 170 people next month. According to the reports, some of this has to do with the recent cancellation of The Croods 2. The TAG Blog reveals more reasons...

Namely the release dates for two particular pictures in the pipeline. Mr. Hulett says that the timetables for these films - I'm guessing 2018's Larrikins and How To Train Your Dragon 3, previously rumored to be on the move - have changed, and that the films have no "hard and fast" release dates. So, to be determined? There was talk of the dragon threequel being moving back a bit, to probably the third or fourth quarter of 2018. Larrikins apparently was being "pulled back into story", indicating that we would have to wait until 2019 for that one. Other rumors suggested that DreamWorks is aiming to do just one picture every calendar year, as opposed to two.

It's a shame, but if it needs to be done, so be it. As long as we get these films, and in the best shape too, the waits will be worth it. I understand the possibility of How To Train Your Dragon 3 being pushed back *yet* again is a sore spot for some, I'm particularly miffed, but the reason I'm not as upset is because I'm more worried about possible cancellation than a delay. I'd rather wait than not have it at all, you know? How To Train Your Dragon 2 did very well at the overseas box office, but it wasn't quite the domestic champion, and DreamWorks let some of their staff go when the movie opened to underwhelming numbers.

As long as these two films still happen, that's all I care about at this point. As long as Universal heads allow DreamWorks to do what they please and take some risks, I'll be fine... But we don't know what Universal wants out of DreamWorks. While Illumination is headed up by a CEO with a clear vision of where to go (whether we like that particular vision or not), DreamWorks is currently headed up by these guys. Will they beg for more mindless, kid-friendly things and franchise stuff? Or will they back off and let them do their thing?

Who knows, but it appears that these heads want DreamWorks to really scale down. It makes sense, because unlike Illumination, DreamWorks mostly operates out of California and overspends on their films. While Trolls is doing quite well here in the states, it seems to be slogging overseas, which isn't good for a film that cost $125 million to make. What they need to do, to me, is find a way to keep those budgets under control because not every PG-rated family-friendly CGI film is going to make serious coin at the box office. You can't just expect things like Trolls and Boss Baby to be locked for $400 million worldwide grosses. You can't just pull $400 million out of a hat, magically.

The plot continues to thicken...